OK, so within the context of bitcoin maximalism, IF tokens were liquid and chains were interoperable and the conversion was abstracted away from the user, could we see a world in which other networks could coexist?

Steve Dunn boosted

I think we are better off focusing more on digital money and less on art criticism and meat-eating.

I think we are better off focusing more on digital money and less on art criticism and meat-eating.

Steve Dunn boosted

came so close to dying this year. Just another reason is king.

"A successful exploit of this vulnerability could have been so disruptive that transacting Bitcoin Cash safely would no longer be possible, completely undermining the utility (and thus the value) of the currency itself. Instead, the vulnerability was fixed without incident, and publicly disclosed on May 7, 2018."

medium.com/@coryfields/http-co

Hi everyone. I'm new to bitcoin maximalism and I'm not a programmer so please be kind. My main question for now is whether the functionality of networks with more flexible scripting (such as ETH) will eventually be available on bitcoin through sidechains or some other form of interoperability. Bitcoin-based CryptoKitties is a frivolous but telling example. If this and everything else envisioned for other networks could be enabled on Bitcoin, this seems like a powerful case for maximalism.

Bitcoin Mastodon

A mastodon instance for Bitcoin Maximalists.
No scams, no shitcoin, no impersonation, no begging, and no illegal content.
Keep it civil and we should all survive :)