The people who want tail emissions (i.e. continual inflation) don't seem to recognise that would impact people's desire to store value in the coin.

The 'continual security budget' might actually decline in real terms if the coin value goes down over time.

But muh 'guaranteed security budget'!

Doesn't matter if you turn the coin into an inflationary shitcoin that less people hold.

Not very guaranteed if you ask me!

@stephanlivera Just to steelman a bit: If tail emissions were necessary for Bitcoins survival then NOT having them would also affect peoples willingness to save in a doomed currency

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Bitcoin Mastodon

Bitcoin Maston Instance